Legal Opinion

Tate v. Bank of New York

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Lynchburg rendered July 3, 1897, in a proceeding by motion for a judgment wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was one of the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

September 14, 1896, B. E. Hughes made his two notes to the order of J. Emory Hughes, one for $1,400, and the other for $1,450, payable four months after their date, at the Traders Bank, of Lynchburg, Va., and both notes were endorsed by J. Emory Hughes and J. D. Tate for the accommodation of the maker, and discounted at the said bank.

Before maturity, the notes were also endorsed by the Traders Bank, of Lynchburg, and turned over to the Third Hational Bank, of New York, as collateral security, with other notes, for a loan by the last named bank to the Traders Bank, of Lynch-burg.

In December,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Welch v. MandevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Fant v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
  3. Mitchell v. St. Maxent's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Brooks v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  5. Persinger's Adm'r v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robertson's v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. BouknightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  4. Dowler v. Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Gallion & Gregory v. WinfreeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API