Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 23, 1996No. 95SA291, 96SA205PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We accepted transfer of this case under C.A.R. 50 prior to judgment of the court of appeals in order to review the District Court’s application of section 13-17-203, 6A C.R.S. (1996 Supp.), to class counsel’s request for an attorney fees award in Kuhn v. Colorado, No. 89CV9164, pending in Denver District Court. Because we find that class counsel’s right to the fee had vested prior to the passage of section 13-17-203, we reverse the trial court’s ruling and remand this ease for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Wendel Speer Kuhn, Jr. et al., individually…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Oliver S. Brown v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Etc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Ashland Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. City of Golden v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Brody v. HellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Shell Western E&P, Inc. v. Dolores County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Hawes v. Colorado Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API