State v. Stewart
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.
_JjThis appeal concerns the time limitations for commencing trial against a defendant and whether, under the circumstances of this case, the failure of defendant, Chaka Stewart, to appear due to his incarceration in another state interrupted that time limitation. The trial court found that no such interruption occurred and accordingly, granted Mr. Stewart’s motion to quash, a ruling the State now appeals. For the reasons, that follow, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and' remand this matter for further proceedings.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant, Chaka…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Succession of BoyterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Jacobs v. City of BunkieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- State v. RomarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Sudwischer v. Estate of HuffpauirSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Louisiana v. Chaka StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
- State v. VernonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. PierreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Ray Harbin, Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.