Legal Opinion

Tinkess v. Burns

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHenry A. Hudson, J.

The defendants have moved to cancel, the Us pendens filed in the Jefferson County Clerk’s office in this action on the 7th day of May, 1959 upon the ground, first, that the complaint in the action was not verified and, second, that as appears from the complaint, the cause of action stated therein is for a rescission and not one to impress a lien and, therefore, that it is not in its nature an action brought to recover a judgment affecting the title to, or the possession of or enjoyment of real property.

There is no dispute that the complaint, which together with the summons, was served upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. William Rosenzweig Realty Operating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Interboro Operating Corp. v. Commonwealth Security & Mortgage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Metz v. Forest Hills Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Metz v. Forest Hills Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of SabatinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API