Brant v. State of Nevada
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Thomas E. Brant, Case No. 2:22-cv-01205-GMN-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. & 8 Report and Recommendation State of Nevada, 9 Defendant. 10 11 Pro se plaintiff Thomas E. Brant filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 12 1)1 and a complaint (ECF No. 1-1). Because Plaintiff’s complaint is improperly brought under 42
13 U.S.C. § 1983
and because Plaintiff has not alleged a constitutional violation, the Court 14 recommends dismissal of his complaint. Because the Court recommends dismissal of his 15 complaint, it denies…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.