Legal Opinion

Baier v. Schermerhorn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Eeiioe to review a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse county: O. B. "WymaN, Circuit Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Cassoday, 0. J.

This action was originally commenced in justice’s court by Schermerhorn for the unlawful obstruction of the public highway described, by Baier, December 5,1894, whereby he was obliged to turn back with his team, to his damage. Baier answered by way of a general denial, and further specifically denied that the locus in quo ever was a public highway or any highway whatever, and alleged that at the time mentioned he was the owner and lawfully in possession of said lands and premises, and that at the time mentioned Schermerhorn was wrongfully and unlawfully trespassing upon his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mahler v. BrumderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Zettel v. City of West BendWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bumbalek v. PeehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Evans v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Rodd v. VerageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Husband v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Anstee v. Monroe Light & Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Warden v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API