Legal Opinion

Sozzi v. Gull

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1963No. Civ. No. 20414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Respondents, Joseph and Lena Sozzi, individually and as guardians ad litem, filed this action for personal injuries sustained by their minor daughter, Angelina, and for the wrongful death of another daughter, Mary. The girls were riding as guests in an automobile owned and operated by Angelina’s fiancé, Donald T. McGinity. The McGinity Mercury was involved in a collision with a 1946 *233Ford owned by the appellant, John W. Gull, and operated with his permission by his minor son, the appellant, John M. Gull. McGinity was originally named as a defendant but subsequently dismissed by nonsuit, as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Burke v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Sopp v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Formosa v. Yellow Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API