Legal Opinion

Hawkeye Portland Cement Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

— This appeal presents no controversy as to the facts, since the demurrer admits the well pleaded averments. Certain questions of law are involved, arising from the allegations of the answer to which the demurrer of plaintiff was inter*1251posed. We deem it unnecessary to make answer to all of the matters submitted to the trial court for decision, and will, therefore, give our attention to the legal propositions which are primary and controlling. Before discussing the law of the case, it is necessary to outline briefly the allegations contained in the pleadings.

The plaintiff-appellant is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  4. Ryan v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wood Bros. Thresher v. EicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Curtis v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Libby v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Gardner v. Trustees of Main Street Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API