Legal Opinion

Barrington v. City of Sherman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1941No. 13085PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

The parties will be referred to as in the court below. The events leading to the controversy, in short, are these: About five years before the City of Sherman adopted its general zoning ordinance, H. E. Bar-rington, plaintiff herein, established and had maintained, on his residence lot, a public garage for the repair of automobiles, employed several mechanics, and built up a valuable local patronage; and, as an incident, stored automobiles being repaired on his premises. The increase of business required more room for the storage of cars, but after the adoption of the original…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Leahy v. Inspector of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of West University Place v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Pharr v. TippittTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hunt v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Weaver v. HamTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bliss v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API