Legal Opinion

Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1943No. 3223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

Two motions are before the Court: Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the defendant, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint.

The plaintiff, a stockholder of the defendant corporation, has filed a complaint seeking to enjoin the submission of a new by-law1 to a vote of the shareholders of the corporation at a special and adjourned annual meeting, to be held July 13, 1943. The by-law, if adopted by the shareholders, would authorize the Board of Directors of the corporation to issue options, within *622one year thereof, to a group of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API