Legal Opinion
Actuarial Benefits & Design Corp. v. Virginia Employment Commission
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided December 17, 1996No. Record 0062-96-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Actuarial Benefits & Design Corporation (appellant) appeals an order of the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond (trial court) affirming the Virginia Employment Commission’s (commission) decision that Rosemary Lipcsey is entitled to full unemployment benefits. Appellant contends that the trial court erred because (1) the commission failed to make a finding that Ms. Lipcsey had good cause to resign as required by Code § 60.2-618(1), and (2) the commission’s statutory interpretation, of Code § 60.2-612(8) was erroneous. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Commonwealth v. EllettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Unemployment Compensation Commission v. TomkoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Dan River Mills, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Hampton Roads Sanitation District Commission v. City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chauncey F. Hutter, Inc. v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Atlas Van Lines and Legion Insurance Company v. Edward J. KerrCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Chauncey F. Hutter, Inc., d/b/a PRO-TAX v. Virginia Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Hagood v. Virginia Employment CommissionRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2011
- Herington v. Univar SolutionsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.