Legal Opinion

Schallinger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 2, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

These are actions of tort, tried together to a jury, to recover for the death and conscious suffering of the plaintiff’s intestate resulting from his fall on February 28, 1950, on an accumulation of ice at the entrance of a building numbered 1486 on Tremont Street in Roxbury caused by the alleged negligence of each of the defendants. The building in question which was of one story with a flat roof had been erected in 1941 by one Gould, the predecessor in title to the defendant HCB Realty Company, according to specifications supplied by the prospective tenant of the building, the defendant The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. LeBlanc v. Atlantic Building & Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Hannon v. SchwartzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Dalton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Blanchard v. Stone's Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Quinn v. CrimmingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fitzsimons v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Thornton v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Hopkins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Byrne v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Sheehan v. El Johnan, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API