Legal Opinion

Martin, Jr. v. Heintz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1933No. 23748PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The conflict of opinion by reason of which the record in this case was certified to this court was upon the question of error of the trial court in refusing a request of plaintiff to reopen his case for the purpose of introducing further evidence. However, the primary question presented, and we regard it controlling and decisive of the case, is whether the trial court was warranted in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence upon the ground of contributory negligence as a matter of law, or that the evidence adduced by plaintiff gave rise to a presumption of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kazdan v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Woodworth v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bauer v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Troop a Riding Academy v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Pitt, Admx. v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API