Legal Opinion
Alonso v. City of Hammond
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1995No. 64A03-9406-CV-225PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Judge.
Thomas and Sandra Alonso, et al. (collectively "Alonso") contend that the trial court erred by (1) denying their motion to certify a class action, and by (2) entering judgment for defendants City of Hammond and Sanitary District (Hammond) on the claim of inverse condemnation. This court granted Alonso's petition for interlocutory appeal on July 27, 1994.
FACTS
On May 25, 1991, rainwater and sewage backed up in basements of certain residential and business property in Hammond, Indiana. On November 7, 1991, Alonso filed a proposed class action complaint sounding in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Collier v. PraterIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Cole v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Budden v. Board of School CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. J.L. Manta, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Budden v. Board of School CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Beta Steel Corp. v. Porter CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998