Legal Opinion
Busch-Provo, Ltd. v. Sloan (In Re Larsen)
District Court, D. Utah
Decided August 10, 1993No. Bankruptcy No. 87C-02615. Adv. No. 92PC 2400. No. 92-C-1034JPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JENKINS, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This adversary interpleader proceeding was commenced by a complaint filed October 7, 1992, in the United States Bankruptcy Court under Bankruptcy Rule 7022. Rule 7022 applies Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to bankruptcy adversary proceedings. 1 Plaintiff, Busch-Provo Limited Partnership (“Busch-Provo”), paid into the bankruptcy court approximately $27,000, which represents the amount due from the partnership to the holder of a 4% limited partnership interest. Busch-Provo itself has no interest in the deposited…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- NDEP Corp. v. Handl-It, Inc. (In Re NDEP Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Control Center, L.L.C. v. LauerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Schwinn Plan Committee v. AFS Cycle & Co. (In Re Schwinn Bicycle Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Anderson v. Simchon (In Re Southern Textile Knitters, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
- William M. Condrey, P.C. v. Endeavour Highrise, L.P. (In Re Endeavour Highrise, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.