Legal Opinion

Neal v. Spence

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

David F. Lee, Jr., J.

This is a motion on behalf of the defendant William E. Hewitt, III, to compel the defendant John A. Spence, II, to disclose on examination before trial the identity of the passenger riding in the automobile operated by him at the time of the collision giving rise to this personal injury action.

The facts, briefly, are: An automobile being operated by the defendant Spence, owned by the defendant Q-uy F. Johnson, Inc., and a motorcycle owned and operated by the defendant Hewitt came into collision. The plaintiff was riding as a passenger on the motorcycle. On examination…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rivera v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Majchrzak v. HagertyNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Scheer v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sanfilipo v. Baptist Temple, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Votey v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alongis v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API