Legal Opinion
Schlimmer v. Poverty Hunt Club
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 10, 2004No. Record 031773PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Justice KINSER.
Karl R. Schlimmer ("Schlimmer"), and his parents, Herman and Doreen Schlimmer, filed a second amended motion for judgment against Nolen L. Cofield ("Cofield"), Poverty Hunt Club ("Hunt Club"), and 12 other defendants for personal injuries Schlimmer sustained in a hunting accident when Cofield shot him. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Cofield and the Hunt Club (collectively, "the Defendants"). 1 After considering Schlimmer's motion to set aside the jury verdict, the circuit court affirmed the verdict and entered judgment in favor of Cofield and the Hunt Club.
Schl…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Justus v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- McClung v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Caplan v. BogardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Smith v. New Dixie Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Yeary v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Porter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Kaltman v. ALL AMERICAN PEST CONTROL, INC.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Steward v. HOLLAND FAMILY PROPERTIES, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Parker v. Carilion ClinicSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.