Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Butler

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1936No. 1583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE BLANC, Judge.

Judged by the prayer of the petition, this is a possessory action. As incidental thereto, plaintiff asks for damages against the defendants, but the nature of the suit is possessory, pure, and simple.

The defendants, in answering, denied the allegations of plaintiff’s petition in toto, and, assuming the position of plaintiffs in reconvention, asked for damages against her and also asked that the court appoint a surveyor to run and establish the line between the respective properties.

The lower court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment recognizes her as the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Haas Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Vidrine v. VidrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Brumfield v. CryerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Harman's Heirs v. O'MoranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ducote v. BarrasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. McDaniels v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API