Clark v. Hammeken (In Re Hammeken)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
HOLLOWELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Debtors claim that they have no interest in certain property consisting of two houses, a mobile home and a red Corvette. The evidence, however, demonstrated that they are, in fact, the owners of everything except the red Corvette. The Debtors also failed to accurately and completely fill out their schedules and statement of financial affairs. Accordingly, they are not entitled to a discharge of their debts. The reasons for these conclusions are addressed in the balance of this decision.
II. BACKGROUND FACTS
Walter and Patricia…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fogal Legware of Switzerland, Inc. v. Wills (In Re Wills)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Deborah M. Cox, Debtor. Paul Lansdowne, Trustee v. Deborah M. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Aubrey v. Thomas (In Re Aubrey)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Beauchamp v. Hoose (In Re Beauchamp)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Garcia v. Coombs (In Re Coombs)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re ButtsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Adams v. Bostick (In Re Bostick)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- In re CorreraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
- In Re AshrafUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2007
- Irwin Robert Pearlstein and Chris Ramsower-PearlsteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2022