Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Agwilines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
In Civil Action No. 31 — 246 the defendant, Agwilines, Inc., has moved — “for an order pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c] granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Agwilines, Inc., dismissing the complaint herein, on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to the affirmative defense that plaintiffs are not subject to the maximum hours provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 [29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.] because defendant was at all material times…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hughes Brothers Timber Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Roland v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1947
- REGAL-BELOIT CORP. v. KAWASAKI Kisen KaishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Regal-Beloit Corporation v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.