Legal Opinion

Conard v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1962No. 50640PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— Plaintiff, an operator of a trucking line, brings this suit in equity to reform a liability insurance policy as against defendant insurance company, and in the alternative for damages against the defendants, Forret & Reich, the selling insurance agents. Plaintiff bases his case upon a telephone call wherein he inquired of Mr. Reich, one of the partners of the insurance agency, if he was covered in the event a salesman or somebody went out the door and coming up the steps fell down and broke their leg or anybody on the dock got hurt. Plaintiff states Mr. Reich said that his policy did cover…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. WeareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Davis v. Central Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Baldwin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Smith v. Packard & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Mortenson v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Gablick v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Albert Wiltgen v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, A/K/A Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API