Legal Opinion
Putnam v. City of Irving
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided January 27, 2011No. 05-10-01269-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice LANG-MIERS.
We deny appellants’ motion for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc. On the Court’s own motion, we withdraw our opinion of December 13, 2010 and vacate the judgment of that date. This is now the opinion of the Court.
This is an expedited appeal under a statute that applies to the issuance of public securities. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 1205.001-.152 (West 2000). The City of Irving, Texas, sought a declaratory judgment to validate the issuance of municipal bonds for the construction of an entertainment center and hotel complex and the pledge of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. DuenezTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Buckholts Independent School District v. GlaserTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Tom James of Dallas, Inc. v. Cobb, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hotze v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- City of San Antonio v. Headwaters Coalition, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Ex Parte the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- Ex Parte City of Irving, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Bruce R. Hotze and Paul Bettencourt v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.