Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hopkins
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1922No. Civil No. 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlanigan, J.
(After Stating the Facts as Above.) — The decision of the case calls for a construction of Act Cong. April 22, 1908, 35 Stat. 65, c. 149, commonly known as the Employers’ Liability Act (U. S. Comp. Stats., §§ 8657-8665; 8 Fed. Stats. Ann., pp. 1339-1378), to determine whether the four minor children may properly be said to be “next of kin dependent upon such employee,” within the meaning of the act, of which the part pertinent to this case is section 1 (section 8657), reading as follows:
“Every common carrier by railroad while engaging in commerce between any of the several states or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Duval v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KenneySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carianni v. SchwenkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Young v. Honolulu Construction & Draying Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1938
- Pittsburgh National Bank, Administrator of the Estate of Clifford B. Waltham, Deceased v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Myers v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.