Legal Opinion
Williams v. City of Dallas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided August 8, 2001No. 05-00-01095-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice WHITTINGTON.
Erik Williams and Michael Irvin appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Dallas, Bennie R. Click, James Chandler, Ross Salverino, Kim Sanders (collectively “appellees”), and David Goelden, individually and in their official capacities as police officers of the City. In three issues, appellants contend the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees because (i) appellants’ claims are not barred by collateral estoppel, (ii) the City is hable under the Texas Tort Claims Act, 1 and (hi) the individual appellees…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Meru v. Huerta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- McMahon Contracting, L.P. v. City of Carrollton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Southern Electrical Services, Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Batte v. Hendricks, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Querencia Properties, S. De R.L. De C v. v. New Querencia Capital Partners, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.