Legal Opinion

Gulledge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1935No. 4 Div. 121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment contained two counts, but upon arraignment of the accused count one thereof was nol prossed, as shown by the judgment. The remaining count, charged this appellant, in proper form and substance, with the offense of having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors or beverages.

Appellant here, and apparently for the first time, complains of the verdict, insisting, among other things, it was insufficient to support the judgment of conviction pronounced and entered by the court.

As stated,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blount v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1873
  2. Morrissette v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Russell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Gulledge v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API