Legal Opinion
Sacco v. Pataki
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 2000No. 95 Civ. 8627(MGC), 96 Civ. 9291(MGC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
These two actions were filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Each action has multiple plaintiffs. The sixty-two plaintiffs in Thomas Sacco, et al. v. George E. Pataki, et al., 95 Civ. 8627, are current or former members of the Truck Drivers Local Union 807 (“Local 807”) of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (the “International”). The two hundred plaintiffs in Judith Abramson, et al. v. George E. Pataki, et al., 96 Civ. 9291, are current or former members of Local 829 of the Exposition Worker’s Union. Neither of these actions is a class action. Although…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Abramson v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Abramson v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Marino v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dowd v. DeMarcoDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. v. WalshDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.