Hicks v. Bridges
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff and defendant in intervention, Nancy Bridges Hicks, from a summary judgment in favor of respondents and plaintiffs in intervention, Frances Foster and George R. Andersen. The plaintiff was divorced from Harry R. Bridges on January 20,1955. She and Harry R. Bridges are the owners as joint tenants in fee simple of certain real property in the city of San Francisco. Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting the partition and sale of this property. Defendant Harry R. Bridges filed an answer alleging a debt of $7,843.36 owed to Frances Foster and George R. Andersen.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Perry v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Reid v. GillespieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3Cited by13 opinions
- Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Schrimscher v. BrysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Kirby v. Albert D. Seeno Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Barisich v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Helfer v. HubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.