Carmack v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
Action on motion: allowed in part and denied in part. “After review of Plaintiffs objections, the Court adopts the report and recommendation.”
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT MBCR’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff Joseph T. Carmack (“Mr.Carmack”) has brought two actions, pro se, challenging his termination from employment as a locomotive engineer for the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) and his subsequent treatment during his efforts to be reinstated. The first action, Civil Action No.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Biolitec, Inc. v. Angiodynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Baldwin v. Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- TrailblazHers Run Co. v. Boston Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025