Legal Opinion

Carmack v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 10, 2006No. Civil Action 05-11430-PBSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

Action on motion: allowed in part and denied in part. “After review of Plaintiffs objections, the Court adopts the report and recommendation.”

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT MBCR’S MOTION TO DISMISS

DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff Joseph T. Carmack (“Mr.Carmack”) has brought two actions, pro se, challenging his termination from employment as a locomotive engineer for the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) and his subsequent treatment during his efforts to be reinstated. The first action, Civil Action No.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biolitec, Inc. v. Angiodynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  2. Baldwin v. Pilgrim Nuclear Power StationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. TrailblazHers Run Co. v. Boston Athletic AssociationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API