Legal Opinion

Williams v. Packard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1905No. 5539Published

Appeal from an order of tbe superior court for Snohomish county, Denney, J., entered July 21, 1904, reviving the lien of a judgment, upon motion of the plaintiff, after overruling a demurrer to the.motion.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This appeal involves the revival of a judgment. The original judgment was rendered November 30, 1897. On March 21, 1903, a motion to revive and continue was filed in the cause. The motion recites that, since the entry of the judgment, the plaintiff in the action died, intestate; that Eobert Smallman and Thomas H. Williams, being designated by the will as executors thereof, were duly appointed as such, and that they have been the duly qualified and acting executors of the estate since the 8th day of September, 1900. The motion was verified by said Eobert Smallman. After the filing of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmer v. LabereeWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Bettman v. CowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Swinburne v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Anderson v. TuratiWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Raught v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API