Legal Opinion

Kolodziej v. Savarese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant met his prima facie burden of demonstrating his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by providing competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain injuries under the permanent consequential limitation of use and/or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]; Staff v Yshua, 59 AD3d 614 [2009]; Rodriguez v Huerfano, 46 AD3d 794, 795 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Staff v. Mair YshuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WILLIAMS, TYSHAWN J. v. JONES, LAVALRA M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Diaz v. ChaudhryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. WILLIAMS, TYSHAWN J. v. JONES, LAVALRA M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API