Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Chaudhry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ordered that the order entered September 30, 2010, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While we affirm the order entered September 30, 2010, insofar as appealed from, we do so, in part, on a ground not relied upon by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motion to vacate their default in opposing the plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew his opposition to *591their summary judgment motion, as their claim of law office failure was supported by a detailed and credible explanation of the default (see Kohn v Kohn, 86 AD3d 630…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Grasso v. AngeramiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Kohn v. KohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. AhmedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Escoto v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API