State v. Bruyere
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Court for oral argument on May 9, 2000, pursuant to an order that directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memo-randa filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be decided at this time.
The defendant, Roger E. Bruyere (defendant), appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in Superior Court in which a jury found him guilty of first-degree…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Johnny B. Milton v. P.J. Morris, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Paul Solina and Ronnie BruscinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- State v. AshnessSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Weybosset Hill Investments, LLC v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- State v. Charles MitchellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Perry v. GareySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.