Legal Opinion

FLORY v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, LLC

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 20, 2019No. 3:18-cv-15522Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DINA FLORY, Civil Action No. 18-15522 (AET) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, LLC, et al., Defendants. BONGIOVANNI, Magistrate Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff Dina Flory’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for attorney’s fees and costs. [Docket Entry No. 9]. Defendants McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, LLC (“McCabe”), and First Atlantic Credit Union (“First Atlantic) (collectively, “Defendants”) oppose Plaintiff’s motion. The Court has fully reviewed and considered all arguments made in support of and in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API