Merritt v. Gibson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Switzerland Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Elliott, J. —
I can not assent to the conclusion that where mortgaged property is not of value sufficient to satisfy the judgment embodied in a decree of foreclosure the mortgagee may, upon showing that fact, have a receiver appointed to collect the rent during the year allowed for redemption, for I think that the mere fact that the mortgaged property is not of value sufficient to satisfy the judgment does not authorize the appointment of a receiver. I do not ■doubt that there may be cases where a receiver can be appointed, but I do believe that to justify the exercise of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hervey v. KrostIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.