Legal Opinion

Cranston v. Bluhm

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

This court has defined a conspiracy as “a combination of two or more persons by some concerted action to accomplish some unlawful purpose or to accomplish by unlawful means some purpose not in itself unlawful.”

The gist of the alleged conspiracy is that Bluhm and Prudential conspired to close the Lyric Theatre and thus eliminate the only theatre in Stevens Point which competed for patronage with Prudential’s Fox Theatre. The purpose of the alleged conspiracy is not in itself unlawful so the test of whether the instant complaint states a good cause of action is dependent on whether it alleges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Singer v. SingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wachowski v. LutzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Waterville v. KelleherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mann Theatres Corp. of California v. Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Augustine v. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Onderdonk v. LambWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Modern Materials, Inc. v. Advanced Tooling Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Cooper v. Vitraco, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API