Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Merced Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1924No. Civ. No. 2779PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action was begun by the above-named plaintiffs against the above-named defendants to determine the rights of the plaintiffs, as contract holders, to certain water rights obtained by them from the CrockerHuffman Land and Water Company, the water rights of' which company had been purchased by the defendant Merced Irrigation District. L. E. Danley, the appellant in this action, after obtaining leave therefor, filed a complaint in intervention. This complaint set out the necessary jurisdictional facts as to his being a land owner and taxpayer within the exterior boundaries of the Merced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stich v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Danley v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danley v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Danley v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API