Brogger v. Kezer

COYTE, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of the Industrial Commission’s denial of her claim for workmen’s compensation. We set aside the order.

The following facts are undisputed.

Claimant and her husband were the principal officers of a corporation, James J. Brogger and Associates (Employer), which does engineering work. They maintained the company office in their home. Payment on the mortgage of the house was made in part by the claimant and her husband, personally, and in part by the employer-corporation. Mr. Brogger and claimant had owned other properties in which they had lived and maintained an…