Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ELLIS, Senior District Judge.
This social security appeal presents the novel question whether the proceeds of the sale of a marital home — placed in escrow by divorcing parties — are a countable resource for purposes of assessing eligibility to receive Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. The Commissioner of Social Security denied Marguerite Kelley’s application for SSI benefits on the ground that these proceeds were a countable resource rendering her ineligible for SSI benefits. The District Court upheld this decision. We agree and affirm.
I
Marguerite Kelley…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lisa Schaudeck v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Sharon Bingham Matthews v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Russell Hess, III v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- In Re Estate of SkinnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Williford v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Arunachalam v. GordonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- GRANCEA v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.