Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance v. Cameron Country Mutual Insurance

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 16, 1990No. 85-2390 C (2)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FILIPPINE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for a decision on the merits after trial to the Court. The parties have filed post-trial briefs and responses thereto. The Court adopts this memorandum opinion as its findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52.

The plaintiff, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), brought suit against the Cameron Country Mutual Insurance Company (“Cameron”) for breach of contract.1 Hanover issued a policy of insurance No. HNL-0839540 (“Hanover’s policy”) to Paul Weaver (“insured”). It covered his premises located in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. John A. Newman v. Irwin Schiff, John A. Newman v. Irwin SchiffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Coffman Industries, Inc. v. Gorman-Taber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse New York, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2013
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Central Air Control, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  3. Graber, Inc. v. W&Z Contracting Construction, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API