Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 10, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-139; Court 13-00352Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Katzmann, Judge:

Can a surety’s argument—that' the United States Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) demands for payment on bonds issued by the surety are untimely because they fall outside of the statutory limitations period—be raised in an administrative protest before Customs? Can the surety challenge Customs’ denial of its protest and raise that argument before this court? These are the principal questions presented by. this case. Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) initiated this lawsuit seeking a declaration from this Court that the claims of Customs for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API