Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Colorado Spring Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1974No. Civ. A. 74-955, 74-2174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VanARTSDALEN, District Judge.

An ordinance of the City of Philadelphia providing for the licensing and regulating of massage parlors, whereb^employees of massage parlors are completely prohibited from massaging persons of the opposite sex)has been challenged as being unconstitutional in Civil Action 74-955 (Velvet Touch) and Civil Action 74-2174 (Rubenstein). The challenged portion of the ordinance provides: — (Ordinance 9-610(4))

Prohibited Conduct. No person employed or engaged in the business of masseur or masseuse shall treat a person of the opposite sex.

The quoted portion…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. NielsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Clemens v. Toneca, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Niswonger v. American Aviation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API