Legal Opinion

Reed v. Brunson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 4, 1988No. 86-982Published

1Opinion of the Court

527 So.2d 102 (1988)

John Kenneth REED and Rene Reed

v.

Coyce Edward BRUNSON, et al.

86-982.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 4, 1988.

Patrick M. Sigler and Stephen C. Moore, Mobile, for appellants.

E.L. McCafferty III, Dennis McKenna, and Jon A. Green of Inge, Twitty, Duffy, Prince & McKean, Mobile, for appellees.

HOUSTON, Justice.

Plaintiffs, John Kenneth Reed and his wife, Rene Reed,[1] appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendants, Ed Brunson, Sherman Howell, Jim Babbington, Bill Perkins, and Gerald Phillips (hereinafter sometimes referred to as co-employees), in this action to…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API