Legal Opinion

Modern Horse Shoe Club v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 9, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Moses N. Sale, Judge. (1) The respondent is not legally entitled to engage in the sale of intoxicating liquors, and its officers, members or agents in doing so are guilty of the continuous commission of criminal acts. State ex rel. v. Club, 125 Mo. 308; State v. Tindall, 40 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Moses N. Sale, Judge. (1) The respondent is not legally entitled to engage in the sale of intoxicating liquors, and its officers, members or agents in doing so are guilty of the continuous commission of criminal acts. State ex rel. v. Club, 125 Mo. 308; State v. Tindall, 40 Mo. App. 271; Black, “Intoxicating Liquors,” secs. 142, 528; Woolen and Thornton “The Law of Intoxicating Liquors,” sec. 798. (2) It is not only the right but it is the duty of police officers to make arrests whenever they have reasonable grounds to believe an offense has…

1Opinion of the CourtFerriss, P. J.

Bill for injunction filed in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in November, 1907, by the Modern Horse Shoe Club, a corporation organized under the statutes relating to fraternal and benevolent organizations, and against the members of the board of police 'commissioners of the city of St. Louis, the chief of police, and one Gaffney, captain of police, commanding in the eighth police district of said city.

The bill alleges that the plaintiff is authorized to maintain and does maintain on the premises, number 2309 Chestnut street, in said city, a club house, consisting of twelve rooms,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. Flournoy Live-Stock & Real-Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of CrothersvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. ArseneauxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Carolene Products Co. v. Evaporated Milk Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Russo v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. City of Dallas v. Cluck & MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Moss v. Mississippi Live Stock Sanitary BoardMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API