Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Haile Gold Mine, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 26, 2024No. 3:22-cv-03838Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Deiaokiki Jackson, C/A No. 3:22-CV-03838-JFA-SVH Plaintiff, vs. OPINION AND ORDER Haile Gold Mine, Inc. d/b/a Oceana Gold Haile Goldmine, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Deiaokiki Jackson (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against her former employer, Haile Gold Mine, Inc., d/b/a Oceana Gold Haile Goldmine (“Defendant”), alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against because of her race and disabilities. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.), the case was referred to a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.