Legal Opinion
Young v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2005No. 02-7133PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Jack Young, Debbie Young, Dayle James, and Barbara James purchased property, at a substantially reduced price, adjacent to a superfund site in Hen-ryetta, Oklahoma. They subsequently discovered hazardous substances on their property, but did not take any action to contain or cleanup those substances. Instead, Plaintiffs sued the Federal Government and the City of Henryetta under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERC-LA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675, and Oklahoma law. Plaintiffs sought to recover, among other things, the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Orr v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Maestas v. SeguraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Trinity Industries Inc v. Greenlease Holding CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Friedland v. TIC-THE Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Harman v. PollockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.