Legal Opinion

Stern v. Karlson

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.

Plaintiff herein sues to impress a vendee’s lien. Defendants counterclaim for specific performance. Both sides presently move for summary judgment.

The affidavit submitted on behalf of plaintiff asserts various objections to title, violations and misrepresentations. The prime question presented is the issue with respect to the written representation contained in the contract that “ Seller represents that 1882 Fulton Street is legal for occupancy by 4 apartments and 2 stores.” The report of the Building Department, annexed to the moving papers, discloses that the legal occupancy for the subject…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Acme Realty Co. v. . SchinasiNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Hammer v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Kaloumenos v. BottaccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Jennings v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Jennings v. BaumannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rubin v. PugatchNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API