Legal Opinion

Inwood National Bank and Inwood Bancshares, Inc. v. D. Kyle Fagin, Individually and as Trustee and Beneficiary of the D. Kyle Fagin Qualified Subchapter S Trust

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2025No. 24-0055Published

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0055 ══════════ Inwood National Bank and Inwood Bancshares, Inc., Petitioners, v. D. Kyle Fagin, Individually and as Trustee and Beneficiary of the D. Kyle Fagin Qualified Subchapter S Trust, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════ PER CURIAM A trust agreement provided that the grantor intended to transfer to the trust her shares of a bank’s stock “[u]pon approval by” the bank. But before the bank gave that approval, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. ACS Investors, Inc. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. G & H TOWING CO. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API