Legal Opinion
Edward C. Krienke v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, and Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 7, 1958No. 12014_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by him while employed as a brakeman for defendant, Illinois Central Railroad Company, 1 it appeals. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company, hereinafter sometimes referred to as '“Belt,” was also a defendant. The judgment was based upon a verdict of a jury which found Belt not guilty, and as to which plaintiff’s motion for new trial is pending in the district court.
We shall state and discuss the errors relied upon by I.C.
Plaintiff’s complaint, in charging I.C. with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fort Worth and Denver Railway Company v. Wayne HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company v. Albert JanskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company v. Willie RoachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Little Rock & M. R. v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Solomon Dehydrating Company, Incorporated v. Clarence R. Guyton, Central Greyhound Lines, Incorporated, and the Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Frank KASPER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAINT MARY OF NAZARETH HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. QuanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Defenders of Wildlife, Inc. v. Endangered Species Scientific AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- In re Tailortowne, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.