Legal Opinion

Vincow v. Vincow

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Defendant husband moves to compel the plaintiff wife to serve and join as a party defendant in this separation action the man with whom she entered into a marriage after she had procured a Mexican decree of divorce against said defendant husband.

Subdivision 1 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act provides in part that ‘ ‘ A person whose absence will prevent an effective determination of the controversy or whose interests are not severable and would be inequitably affected by a judgment rendered between the parties before the court is an indispensable party.” In the case at bar the second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re ButtlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. In Re the Estate of DugroNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Varrichio v. VarrichioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Lauricella v. LauricellaNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Layton v. LaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API