Vincow v. Vincow
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.
Defendant husband moves to compel the plaintiff wife to serve and join as a party defendant in this separation action the man with whom she entered into a marriage after she had procured a Mexican decree of divorce against said defendant husband.
Subdivision 1 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act provides in part that ‘ ‘ A person whose absence will prevent an effective determination of the controversy or whose interests are not severable and would be inequitably affected by a judgment rendered between the parties before the court is an indispensable party.” In the case at bar the second…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re ButtlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In Re the Estate of DugroNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Varrichio v. VarrichioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Lauricella v. LauricellaNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Layton v. LaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.