Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

(PC) Hunter v. Reece

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 18, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02513Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ADRIAN D. HUNTER, No. 2:24-cv-02513 SCR P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 P. REECE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 17

1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1), applications to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2, 7, 10), and motions to appoint counsel (ECF Nos. 6, 8). 19 IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATONS 20 Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API